Skip to main content
British court to rule on Assange’s extradition to US
Campaigners warn of long-lasting damage to global media freedom
Supporters of Julian Assange, march along Whitehall to Downing Street with from the Royal Courts of Justice in London, following a extradition hearing in the case of the WikiLeaks founder, February 21, 2024

CAMPAIGNERS warned of long-lasting damage to global media freedom as Julian Assange’s case returns to court tomorrow.

After years of legal limbo, the High Court in London is due to give a final decision on whether the WikiLeaks founder should be extradited to the United States.

Mr Assange, who published evidence of war crimes committed by the US, is wanted by US authorities on 18 counts over the release of hundreds of thousands of classified documents.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
A demonstrator outside the Royal Courts of Justice, May 13, 2025
Britain / 13 May 2025
13 May 2025

Campaigners say there is clear evidence British weapons are contributing to war crimes as the government goes on trial to defend its continued supply of arms to Israel

Office workers and commuters walking through Canary Wharf in London during the morning rush hour
Workers' Rights / 13 May 2025
13 May 2025
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer speaking during a press conference on the Immigration White Paper in the Downing Street Briefing Room in London, May 12, 2025
Britain / 12 May 2025
12 May 2025

Unions and campaigners condemn Prime Minister's ‘far-right’ rhetoric and new immigration policies

Similar stories
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange waves after landing at RAAF
World / 26 June 2024
26 June 2024
Stella Assange warns case sets dangerous precedent for press freedom
Stella Assange, the wife of Julian Assange, speaks during a
Britain / 20 May 2024
20 May 2024
Features / 20 May 2024
20 May 2024
There have been assurances that Assange does not face the death penalty, but no clear answer as to whether the US first amendment will apply to him; regardless, he should be released and returned to Australia, writes TIM DAWSON