Skip to main content
Regional secretary with the National Education Union
Artificial justice
ANSELM ELDERGILL asks whether artificial intelligence may decide legal cases in the future, in place of human judges, and how AI could reshape the legal landscape
MORE QUESTIONS THAN ANSWERS: AI Truth Machine / LIT Law Lab, Johannes Kepler University (AT) [Ars Electronica/flickr/CC]

OUR courts are in crisis: buildings are crumbling; serious delays are endemic; legal rules are labyrinthine; very few citizens without means are eligible for legal aid; and the judiciary in dress and thought is old-fashioned and hierarchical, its often ill-judged attempts at self-reform and modernity distorted by long-entrenched class privilege.

Is artificial intelligence part of the answer to these and other pressing legal problems or part of a dystopian future?

In Samuel Butler’s 19th century novel Erewhon, the citizens of his imaginary country were concerned that evolution in humans is gradual but in mechanics rapid, concluding that machines would soon surpass and supplant them.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
A woman's hand pressing a key of a laptop keyboard
Britain / 7 February 2025
7 February 2025
INNOVATION/REVOLUTION? 28/09/1971. Salvador Allende, togethe
Opinion / 21 January 2025
21 January 2025
Software engineer SCOTT ALSWORTH explains to his mother
COGITO, ERGO SUM: The Gates of Hell (with The Thinker at its
Books / 16 January 2025
16 January 2025
ANDY HEDGECOCK is inspired by accessible insights into the theory, function and psychological impact of our digital tools
Book Review / 15 November 2024
15 November 2024
JOHN HAWKINS marvels at the blithe dismissal of people as a passive mass in a new work that extols the coming merger of human intelligence with AI