Skip to main content
Work with the NEU
Petition urges closure of Heysham’s damaged nuclear plants
A view of Heysham Nuclear Power Station with electricity pylons in the foreground and wind turbines in the distance, July 2006

HUNDREDS of people signed a petition on its first day today, urging the authorities to shut down the radiation-damaged Heysham nuclear reactors.

The petition by the nuclear safety group Radiation Free Lakeland highlights the concerns of leading radiation experts.

It is to be delivered to Lancaster City Council, the leadership of energy supplier EDF, and the Office for Nuclear Regulation.

The petition states: “We the undersigned urge the closure of Heysham 1 and 2 nuclear power stations.

“These nuclear reactors are now 36 years old and have been given repeated life extensions above and beyond their ‘safe’ lifetime of under 30 years.

“The graphite cores are cracking due to 36 years of bombardment with radiation.”

Radiation Free Lakeland said: “This month marks the 15th anniversary of the Fukushima offshore earthquake, which caused the nuclear disaster.

“The sooner [Heysham 1 and 2] are shut down, the safer we shall all be when the next widely felt earthquake hits the coast off Heysham.”

Campaigners will be in the area over the next few weeks distributing leaflets promoting the petition, which can be signed online.

An EDF spokesperson said: “Nuclear safety is EDF’s overriding priority.

“All our sites, including the Heysham stations, are operated to the highest international standards.

“The stations have been part of the community for more than 50 years with robust regulations in place to ensure the highest levels of safety for our employees and the communities in which we operate.

“We are operating within the graphite safety cases agreed with the ONR for the Heysham stations.

“This includes a demonstration that the reactors can be safely shutdown in the event of a major earthquake, larger than ever recorded in the UK.

“We continuously invest in our staff and the stations to maintain plant integrity and ensure operations are carried out safely and securely, and we only operate these stations if it is safe to do so.”
 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
green philo
Books / 16 January 2026
16 January 2026

BRENT CUTLER welcomes a valuable contribution to discussions around the need to de-carbonise energy production

A general view of the Sizewell nuclear power plant in Suffolk. Picture date: Wednesday June 19, 2024. Picture date: Wednesday June 19, 2024
Opinion / 10 December 2025
10 December 2025

MARK JONES responds to issues raised in the recent report from Richard Hebbert on the Communist Party’s Congress debate on nuclear power

INTERMINABLE DELAYS: The lifting of a 245-tonne steel dome onto Hinkley Point C's second reactor building, at in Bridgwater, Somerset on July 17 2025 - scheduled to be finished by 2025 it now won’t be until 2031
Features / 6 December 2025
6 December 2025

The Communist Party of Britain’s Congress last month debated a resolution on ending opposition to all nuclear power in light of technological advances and the climate crisis. RICHARD HEBBERT explains why

Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump during a press conference at Chequers, near Aylesbury in Buckinghamshire, on day two of the president's second state visit to the UK, September 18, 2025
Features / 2 October 2025
2 October 2025

Once again, working people have been betrayed with false promises about jobs in an industry that is actually making climate change worse, writes LINDA PENTZ GUNTER