Skip to main content
Electoral Commission 'misinterpreted' referendum spending, court rules

THE Electoral Commission “misinterpreted” the definition of legitimate expenses during the EU referendum in favour of Vote Leave, the High Court ruled yesterday.

The Good Law Project (GLP) brought a judicial review over election spending by the pro-Brexit campaign group in the run-up to the June 2016 vote.

Mr Justice Leggatt found the Electoral Commission “interpreted the definition in a way that is inconsistent with both the language and the purpose of the legislation” on referendum spending.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
Britain / 17 June 2021
17 June 2021
All eight claimants say Labour acted unfairly by failing to close investigations or revoke their suspension or expulsion
Similar stories
People light candles for the victims of the Wednesday's shoo
World / 3 January 2025
3 January 2025
Amazon staff members on a GMB union picket line outside the
Editorial: / 2 January 2025
2 January 2025
A woman prepares to cast her vote in Hrusevo, Moldova, Octob
World / 21 October 2024
21 October 2024