Skip to main content
Foundations: How the Built Environment Made Twentieth-century Britain
Sam Wetherell's landmark study of the built environment
Foundations: How the Built Environment Made Twentieth-century Britain

Foundations: How the Built Environment Made Twentieth-century Britain
by Sam Wetherell
(Princeton University Press, £30)

CITY planning may seem a distant and theoretical topic and it often presents itself thus to stay aloof from the masses. But this book is the opposite — compelling and lucid, extremely readable and persuasive, each page is a revelation.

In the face of conditions that render people helpless, it provides a convincing narrative, a rich historical context and suggests grounds for new thinking and action.

Wetherell examines the home, the shop and the workplace as evolving environments that have changed dramatically in the past century. Employing particular examples such as Park Hill in Sheffield, Trafford Park in Manchester or the Merry Hill shopping mall in Birmingham, he demonstrates historical changes in attitude that apply to the country as a whole.

One strand of the book examines the thinking behind the construction of council estates from the 1950s to the 1970s. Beginning with the slum conditions that Engels encountered in the 1840s, when toilets were shared, central heating unheard of and proximity meant the denial of privacy, he traces the utopian schemes of high-density mass housing that were common in capitalist and socialist countries alike.

The opportunity to create rational solutions was shared globally and led to ingenious large-scale schemes that collectivised the use of heating and electricity, often using the by-product of giant industry to save on bills.

The author points out that this was a well-intentioned attempt to “create communities out of proximity” and “streets in the sky,” with designed shared spaces  for communities to meet and children to play.

In the British case, these desirable communities were figured as white and, like the welfare state itself, based on sexist assumptions about gender roles and a homogenous family unit. To be black, single or non-heteronormative sent you to the bottom of the housing list.

The collective logic that improved living standards also reflected the bias of both the designers and the municipal authorities responsible for them.

The same selective criteria applied to housing estates but the towers, unlike the houses, were inherently more difficult to privatise as they relied upon so many shared amenities. The gestation and creation of mass housing took a century to evolve but destruction of the idea of collective responsibility came about very quickly.

The 1980 Housing Act — Thatcher’s “right to buy” wrecking ball —  introduced property speculation as a substitute for the human right to a home. Collective bills and municipal responsibility were replaced with a blizzard of petty disputes. The unprivatisable blocks were first neglected, then flattened.

Wetherell’s investigation of the changing attitude to crime is very telling. Where once crime had been attributed to poverty and regarded as a problem to address through the redistribution of wealth, suddenly it became an unsolvable social given and something to defend yourself against. This change in thinking and political rhetoric gave rise to the hyper-securitised gated community and the ubiquity of surveillance.

The author’s analysis of housing is the centrepiece of a symmetrical argument about the postwar environment and its subsequent mutilation by the right. With forensic clarity, he shows how the municipal shopping precinct became the private pleasure dome of the shopping mall and how the industrial estate assumed the anodyne neutrality of the business park.

We live, he demonstrates, amid the leftovers of repurposed city spaces that have had to accommodate this ideological about-turn.

Wetherell charts the history not to revive it but to be rid of it. In conclusion, he appeals for a new kind of thinking about city space that is owned “neither by distant capital not conservative state technocrats... spaces that are democratic and open to all ways that can begin to redress the inequalities produced by empire, capital and patriarchy.”

In its trenchant examination and rejection of both past and present, this book sets down new foundations. It holds fast to the ambition of not repeating mistakes and of building a better future.

Essential reading.

 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
More from this author
misrepresenting
BenchMarx / 22 May 2025
22 May 2025

ANGUS REID calls for artists and curators to play their part with political and historical responsibility

HONOURED: The Monument to International Brigades on the site
BOOKS / 29 January 2023
29 January 2023
ANGUS REID recommends a landmark work of aural history that follows the intertwined lives of four International Brigaders
Gloria Abernethy sells the Black Panther newspaper while Tam
Photography / 23 December 2022
23 December 2022
ANGUS REID reviews a book that is an important and comprehensive work of documentation
WISH-FOR PANEL:  Mick Lynch, Jeremy Corbyn, Neil Findlay?
Edinburgh International Book Festival round up / 2 September 2022
2 September 2022
ANGUS REID harks back to the times, not that distant, when debates were fearsome confrontations about contemporary, pressing issues
Similar stories
Kathe Kollwitz, Charge, sheet 5 of the cycle Peasants War, 1
Culture / 13 April 2025
13 April 2025
JOHN GREEN is fascinated by a history that excavates the enormous role played by agricultural workers in recent times
HONORABLE TRADITION OF PROTEST: Junior doctors on a picket l
Books / 27 March 2025
27 March 2025
CHRIS MOSS welcomes a radical history that brings marginalised stories and overlooked people and agencies to the centre
MISUNDERSTOOD BRUTALIST GENIUS: Gordon Benson and Alan Forsy
Books / 27 November 2024
27 November 2024
Despite its anti-socialist bias, JOHN GREEN recommends a new survey of British architecture that seeks to educate and provoke
COMFORT FOR THE MANY: Our vote (not that we have one) goes t
Opinion / 20 August 2024
20 August 2024
While applauding the emphasis on re-use, ROBERT GROVER examines the elitist bias of the prize towards south-east England