Skip to main content
NEU Senior Industrial Organiser
Electoral Commission 'misinterpreted' referendum spending, court rules

THE Electoral Commission “misinterpreted” the definition of legitimate expenses during the EU referendum in favour of Vote Leave, the High Court ruled yesterday.

The Good Law Project (GLP) brought a judicial review over election spending by the pro-Brexit campaign group in the run-up to the June 2016 vote.

Mr Justice Leggatt found the Electoral Commission “interpreted the definition in a way that is inconsistent with both the language and the purpose of the legislation” on referendum spending.

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
TORY HIGH SOCIETY:  Sir John Ritblat
Features / 19 September 2025
19 September 2025

It is rather strange that Labour continues to give prestigious roles to inappropriate, controversy-mired businessmen who are also major Tory donors. What could Labour possibly be hoping to get out of it, asks SOLOMON HUGHES

Police officers and protesters clash in Trafalgar Square during a March for Palestine in London, October 14, 2023
Protest Law / 2 May 2025
2 May 2025

Court of Appeal rules key anti-protest legislation was forced through unlawfully

EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW:
Barristers from the Criminal Bar
As
Features / 10 January 2025
10 January 2025
Removing unnecessary bureaucracy and other avoidable costs could save up to a quarter-billion, giving us painless solutions to protect legal aid, writes PROFESSOR ANSELM ELDERGILL