Skip to main content
Advertise with the Morning Star
The case for council communism
The argument that labour parties, supported by conservative trade unions, are instrumental to capitalism has contemporary resonance, suggests GAVIN O’TOOLE 
WORKERS' VOICE: The 1936–1937 Flint sit-down strike at the General Motors plant in Flint, Michigan, US organised by the United Automobile Workers (UAW) formed in 1935. This image inspired the well-known sculpture by Janice Trimpe in Flint’s Sitdowners Memorial Park [Pic: Library of Congress/CC]

The Workers’ Way to Freedom and Other Council Communist Writings 
Anton Pannekoek, edited by Robyn K Winters, PM Press, £23.99

WHEN Lenin wrote “Left-Wing Communism: An Infantile Disorder” in 1920, he was taking aim at diverse critics of the Bolshevik party’s tightening international grip over the interpretation of Marxism.

One of the bones of contention between the “left communists,” as they became known, and Leninists was about the role of political parties themselves, and hence the participation by communists in bourgeois parliaments. Foretelling later doctrinal divergence, this was a dispute about socialist strategy in Western Europe and how best to read the array of class forces confronted by workers — and hence how best to organise — in countries markedly different to revolutionary Russia.
 
A majority of the newly formed Communist Party of Germany (KPD) in December 1918 was opposed to electoral politics and trade unionism, positioning themselves to the left of Bolshevik orthodoxy. However, divisions sundered the new organisation precisely over these issues, fuelling the denunciations of Lenin and others at the Comintern whose official line called for participation in parliamentary elections and fighting to control established trade unions.

This split has been obscured in the shadows of history, yet it remains relevant today because of the questions raised by left communists about the behaviour of labour parties, supported by trade unions, that accept bourgeois parliamentarism uncritically as so-called representatives of workers’ interests. 

The 95th Anniversary Appeal
Support the Morning Star
You have reached the free limit.
Subscribe to continue reading.
Similar stories
Jeremy Corbyn (second left) and Zarah Sultana, MP for Coventry South (second right) on the picket line outside London Euston train station, August 18, 2022
Features / 20 August 2025
20 August 2025

Corbyn and Sultana’s ‘Your Party’ represents the first attempt at mass socialist organisation since the CPGB’s formation in 1921, argues DYLAN MURPHY

The AFL-CIO headquarters
Features / 9 January 2025
9 January 2025
ZOLTAN ZIGEDY reflects on the lessons from two books looking at the US labour movement and the recent history of spontaneous mass uprisings – and finds two pernicious ideologies working against the interests of the people
Seattle shipyard workers leave the shipyard after going on s
Book Review / 11 December 2024
11 December 2024
PAUL BUHLE recommends an exhaustive guide to the grand ambition of bringing revolutionary workers together in a global unitary body 
Features / 3 November 2024
3 November 2024
SAM BROWSE examines how Lenin’s analysis remains relevant for confronting modern challenges of inequality, climate change and rising fascism ahead of an important discussion with the acclaimed historian and activist Paul le Blanc